A common belief among buyers is that substantial quantities of fuel, such as 1 or 2 million barrels, are readily available, idly waiting in tanks for a transaction to materialize. This notion is far from the operational realities of the oil and gas industry. Legitimate sellers, especially those affiliated with refineries, do not stockpile large volumes of fuel without confirmed purchases and financial commitments from buyers. The expectation that significant fuel reserves are on standby for FOB transactions is a myth that overlooks the stringent logistics and financial structures governing the sector.
The preference for FOB deals is often driven by the mistaken belief that they circumvent the need for financial guarantees or substantial upfront commitments. This misunderstanding stems from a lack of awareness about the intricacies of international fuel transactions. Genuine FOB deals still necessitate robust financial assurances to protect the interests of both parties. The allure of bypassing these safeguards can entice buyers into unfeasible agreements, setting the stage for disappointment.
Another red flag in the pursuit of FOB deals is the undue emphasis on speed. Buyers pressing for the completion of transactions within unrealistically short timeframes fail to appreciate the meticulous due diligence and logistical planning essential for successful large-scale oil and gas deals. This rush not only compromises the integrity of the transaction but also signals a lack of understanding of the industry's complexities.
For buyers genuinely interested in securing oil and gas supplies, a shift towards more pragmatic and industry-aligned transaction methods is necessary. Embracing CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) arrangements, where sellers are responsible for the logistics until the fuel reaches the buyer's port, can offer a more structured and secure alternative to the elusive FOB deals. Additionally, buyers must recognize the importance of establishing financial guarantees and adhering to standard procedures that ensure mutual commitment and protection.
Buyers often propose transaction procedures that are incompatible with standard industry practices, particularly the prerequisite of receiving proof of product (POP) before establishing a financial guarantee. This approach neglects the fact that legitimate fuel allocation or production tailored to a buyer's specifications only begins once the seller verifies the buyer's payment capability, typically through a banking instrument from a top-tier bank. Insisting on premature POP can inadvertently attract unscrupulous sellers, leading to a high probability of transaction failure.
In conclusion, while FOB deals might seem attractive on the surface, the realities of the oil and gas industry demand a more informed and cautious approach. By understanding the inherent challenges and aligning expectations with industry standards, buyers can navigate the market more effectively, avoiding the common pitfalls associated with seeking FOB transactions.
We use cookies to improve your experience and to help us understand how you use our site. Please refer to our cookie notice and privacy statement for more information regarding cookies and other third-party tracking that may be enabled.
© 2022 OILMAN NEWS